Why Obama is Failing

August/24/2012 16:14PM
1 interesting comment, join the discussion
Please follow and like us:

Obama is failing because he has never succeeded at anything. Why should anyone be surprised?

He never did anything as an attorney for the University of Chicago. He never did anything as a state senator. He never did anything as a US senator. He has never done anything as the US President. He got the job solely due to diversity.

Most of us in the corporate sector witnessed this same phenomena. This is not racist, it’s just the truth. We had undue pressure to promote employees of color. We tried to push our minorities beyond their capacity because of that pressure. It was unfair to them when they couoldn’t do the jobs we pushed them into. First, we tried to do it exclusively with internal candidates. That was a total disaster. Then we went to the outside to hire people with great credentials.

We had some successes but had far more failures. It wasn’t because we didn’t have minorities who couldn’t succeed in upper management. It was because of the clock. We moved them too fast. Too many, like Obama had no track record with accountability and achieving goals and gaining experience.

This country hired a man to run the company who had never run anything. We shouldn’t be surprised that he has failed. There is a difference between my corporate experience and the Obama experience. The minorities in the corporate world that had to learn on the job and did succeed in high-level jobs, learned on the job. Even though they were moved too fast they were good enough to get it right. To do that they worked at the jobs. Obama  has never worked at his job. He has the same two talents he had last time he ran for office. Reading a teleprompter and campaigning. Sadly, that’s it.

Diversity has been a good thing and a bad thing for minorities. It gave many an opportunity they would not have been given without the pressure. But, it caused far too many to flame out and fail because they got jobs they weren’t ready to do and just couldn’t get the results. Without the pressure they could have grown into those jobs in time, but time was the critical element. Corporations were forced to demonstrate progress with numbers. To get the numbers, good minority employees were moved too fast and failed when they could have succeeded with seasoning.

President Obama is a perfect example of this.

Here’s an article from a business professor at the University of Virginai describing the diversity efforts by Chase Bank. My former corporation had everything in place that this article describes. Still, over 10 years the effort was far from successful. I believe my summary of why we failed(above) is fair and accurate. Over-jobbing Obama is typical.

 

Why diversity efforts fail and how to make them succeed

By , Published: October 29, 2011The Washington Post

The big idea:How can companies stop spinning their wheels and make real progress toward diversity and inclusion?The scenario:Stakeholders throughout J.P. Morgan Chase were asking a simple question: How do we get managers to really recruit the best talent from the largest talent pool — not just the kind of people they were used to getting? Women and people of color inside and outside the firm, becoming frustrated by their experiences on Wall Street, wanted to know the answer. So did the executive team, known as the Operating Committee. It was fully aware that the talent war required that the firm get this right. And the charge was being led by chief executive Jamie Dimon himself.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The point person for answering the question turned out to be someone who wasn’t a recruiter. He wasn’t a member of any of the firm’s female or minority employee-networking organizations. He wasn’t active in national ethnic or gender-leadership organizations. He wasn’t even looking to leave his job as a managing director in asset management. But by March 2007, Mark Settles was assigned to recruit outstanding women and people of color to step into executive positions in the firm. He accepted the job because he believed that he could use his trader’s discipline to catapult the bank’s stature as the Wall Street employer of choice among underrepresented groups. And he knew that he was backed fully by Dimon and would have the CEO’s ear if needed.His pipeline-building strategy was based on his experience as a portfolio manager: Build relationships, acknowledge people as individuals and provide a best-in-class customer experience for prospects. He executed on many tried-and-true recruiting best-practice activities: leveraging referrals, building strong relationships with potential recruits, and strengthening relationships with feeder schools and professional organizations.But Settles remained faithful to his strategy in uncommon ways as well. For example, he advised business-unit executives on creating and executing solid diversity plans to change the way they approached representation. He helped them understand the firm’s real objectives around recruitment, not as expected percentages or quotas, but rather as a goal of making the bank a talent factory that captured as many of the best people as possible. And he enlisted senior executives — especially white men — to help him champion the firm among women and people of color. Not just with lip service support but with authentic, engaged action to sell the bank. In the end, he helped create such a superior on-boarding experience that his recruits became some of the most potent advocates for the bank with future candidates.By having Settles report to the CEO, J.P. Morgan Chase also sent the message that diversity recruitment was important and instantly strengthened recruiter credibility. And Dimon played his role by not tolerating his people’s failure to achieve their diversity objectives.But in the final analysis, was all this enough to make sustained change in the venerable firm? When Settles had moved on, would the recruiting practices take hold? Was making diversity come alive just about recruiting, or was there more to it? These questions preoccupied Settles as he tried to formulate his next steps.

The resolution: Nearly a year and a half later, the company had a strong pipeline of people of color and women poised for advancement. Some have since moved up the ranks. But the jury is still out on how the kind of progress Settles was generating could be sustained now that he has moved to a new position. Will representation of women and people of color continue to grow? And more important, will their presence really change how the firm does business?

The lesson: Making diversity efforts work requires a clear understanding of the larger strategic goals of your organization first. That understanding — combined with the ability to execute on specific diversity initiatives — makes short-term change possible. But sustained change comes only when leaders are persistent, committed to results, relationship-savvy and courageous. They support their people to design systems and processes that make the value of diversity for their business so compelling that it becomes part of the company’s DNA.

Martin Davidson

Davidson is associate professor of business administration at the University of Virginia Darden School of Business and author of “The End of Diversity as We Know It: Why Diversity Efforts Fail and How Leveraging Difference Can Succeed.” His blog is www.leveragingdifference.com.

 

Please follow and like us:

Other Articles You Might Enjoy:

  • No Related Posts

Leave a Reply