This from the Glen Beck show. I have quit listening to Glen and don’t subscribe to his TV Network, but Every now and then Glen still delivers an important message. Here he gives us an insight into Ruth Bader Ginsberg’s perspective on the US Constitution. Interesting that we have a Supreme Court Justice who doesn’t believe the Constitution is a worthwhile document for Egypt to use to set up their purported democracy. I guess they are taking her advice and trying innocent Americans. Blowing off the billions in foreign aid we give them. How’s that Arab Spring working out?
Is it too much for a United States Supreme Court Justice to have a little reverence for the Constitution of the United States? Apparently that’s the case for Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who on a visit to the Middle East was asked if Egypt should model the United States Constitution when setting up theirs. Her response was a disturbing ‘no’ — who did she think Egypt should model and what does the Justice think about our Constitution? Prepare to be offended.
The Blaze reports:
The Supreme Court‘s midwinter break is often used by justices to fly off to sunny vacation spots or European capitals where they address an audience or two on someone else’s tab. But this year, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is on a different sort of visit to two North African countries where popular uprisings helped topple longtime leaders. And in one of those countries — Egypt — she raised eyebrows after saying, during a television interview, that she “would not look to the United States Constitution” as a blueprint for crafting the nation’s new constitution.
The Huffington Post adds:
Since World War II several other models have emerged that offer more specific and contemporary guarantees of rights and liberties, she said, pointing to South Africa’s constitution, which she called a “really great piece of work” for its embrace of basic human rights and guarantee of an independent judiciary. She also noted Canada’s charter of rights and freedoms and the European Convention of Human Rights.
Why might Glenn take issue with this? Well, not only is a woman sworn to defend the Constitution calling it outdated, she is praising South Africa’s Constitution which calls for social justice and an open society.
The South African Constitution preamble says:
We therefore, through our freely elected representatives, adopt this Constitution as the supreme law of the Republic so as to —
Heal the divisions of the past and establish a society based on democratic values, social justice and fundamental human rights; Lay the foundations for a democratic and open society in which government is based on the will of the people and every citizen is equally protected by law; Improve the quality of life of all citizens and free the potential of each person; and Build a united and democratic South Africa able to take its rightful place as a sovereign state in the family of nations.
